Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

The Time has Come to Resurrect The Sons of Liberty

June 13, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Abuse of Power, America's Heritage, Amnesty, Anarchy, Benghazi Gate, Congress, Constitution, EBT Cards, Economic Deception, Eric Holder, Founding Principles, Freedom, Glenn Beck, Illegal Aliens, Immigration, Intimidation, Liberty, Liberty in Jeopardy, Mitch McConnell, Political Courage, President Obama, Progressivism, Redistribution of Wealth, Republicans Vs. Tea Party, Socialism, Speaker John Boehner, United States Sovereignty, Welfare by Admin1

PatriotsThe time has come to resurrect The Sons of Liberty.

We have been hearing for weeks now that the Republican Establishment, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker John Boehner have cooked up an Amnesty Deal. A Deal that will be surreptitiously enacted in the House and Senate such that the final Conference Bill will be passed in the Senate by the Democrat Majority and in the House by a mix of all Democrats and Republican Establishment defectors who will be well rewarded by being allowed to retain their Committee Chairmanships’.

 

The Deal came into the open on the Glenn Beck show when modern-day Patriots Representatives Michele Bachmann (Minn.), Steve King (Iowa) and Louie Gohmert (Texas) along with 67 other stalwarts determined that they could not go along with the deception and decided to risk their careers in a showdown with Boehner.  Read more here Now that the deception has been made public, Speaker Boehner is saying that he doesn’t “intend” to push a bill that violates Republican Party “principles.”

 

Don’t be deceived by the Boehner’s latest ruse.  He fully intends to implement the Deal, unless “We the People”, take back our government. We have to have patience.  We are now engaged in a battle for survival for our way of life. If you value the future for your children and grandchildren, then you must become engaged and stick it out as long as it takes to convince our political class that we have had it and it is Speaker Boehner and the Republicans that defect that will bear the angst of the citizenry.

 

Remember first and foremost that these 70 brave souls have placed their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor on the line for us. We must in turn protect their backs from the administrators of this deception, both now and the future.  We cannot allow the retribution that was delivered to Colonel Allen West to befall any of our brave patriots.

On June 19th you will have an opportunity to stand up against Amnesty and all the other reprehensible scandals that have rocked your faith  in our government by joining  Representatives Michele Bachmann , Steve King  and Louie Gohmert, in front of the U.S. Capital. If you can’t be there physically, you can use the occasion to call your Representatives and Senators as well as to voice  support for the 70 Representatives’  who are demanding that the Speaker honor the  Hastert Rule that requires  support from a majority of the majority to bring a bill forward.

Our way of life has been gradually under attack and sometimes we may feel that there is nothing that we can do. However, our Constitution gives the power to the people and we must make it clear to all our elected Representatives that we will exercise that power to rid our country once and for all from Amnesty, that promises to bankrupt our nation, from surveillance that threatens our Personal Liberty, and from corrupt, anti-Constitutional officials and bureaucrats that threaten our life, our liberty and our pursuit of happiness.

 


 

Avatar of carlos

by carlos

Gun Control Enhance Background Checks Failed 54-46 – 4 Republican Voted Against 2nd Amendment

April 17, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, Constitution, Gun Control, Obama's America 2016, United States Constitution by carlos

Republican That Voted Against 2nd Amendment

In a recent poll only 5% of the respondents cared about Gun Control legislation. Senators Warren and Cowan, of course voted to abridge your 2nd Amendment Right! However, the Senate as a whole, rejected the Legislation!

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes    113th Congress –    1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate

Vote Summary

 

Question:              On the Amendment (Burr Amdt. No. 720 )
Vote Number: 102 Vote Date: April 17, 2013,  05:43 PM
Required For Majority: 3/5 Vote Result: Amendment Rejected
Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 720                          to S. 649                  (Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of2013)
Statement of Purpose: To protect the Second Amendment rights of veterans and their families.
Vote Counts: YEAs 56
NAYs 44
Avatar of admin

by admin

No labels” Proud Of Second Amendment Infringements – Starting The Gun Control Debate – Bill Would Expand Federal Background Checks – 2nd Amendment Infringement

April 12, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Congress, Constitution, Freedom, Gun Control, Obama's America 2016, United States Constitution by admin

Mancini“No Labels” on Gun(Citizen) Control. I guess this is more of the “common ground -outside the choir- bridge building -across the isle” type of rally (effort)the infiltrators are mounting. Fellow defenders of the 2nd Amendment and Article 17 look sharp this is the same road they took on family values, immigration and yes big misgovernment. Can not wait for the latest twisted explanation from the twisted infiltrator ministry of propaganda.

“No labels” Proud Of Second Amendment Infringements – Starting The Gun Control Debate – Bill Would Expand Federal Background Checks – Amendment Infringement

 

 

 

 

Avatar of carlos

by carlos

I just got kicked out of the Greater Boston Tea Party group for questioning the wisdom of inviting the co-founder of the ‘No Labels” group, Ron Shaich , to speak

April 7, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, America's Collapse, Anarchy, Boston Tea Party, First Amendment, Generational Theft, Hope and Change, Illegal Aliens, Liberty in Jeopardy, Marxists, MassGOP, Obama's America 2016, Occupy Boston, Occupy Wall Street, Propaganda, Transparency, United States Constitution by carlos

NolabelI just got kicked out of the Greater Boston Tea Party group for questioning the wisdom of inviting the co-founder of the ‘No Labels” group, Ron Shaich , to speak.
I was told that he was invited because it is good to get opinions from all sides.
Then they kicked me out.
See The Conversation Bellow

Michael McNeil – No Labels.                        

Anti-Tea Party No Labels Co-founder Unleashes Attack on Sarah Palin

www.breitbart.com

John Avlon, the co-founder of the anti-Tea Party and establishment No Labels group, wrote a bizarre attack piece on Sarah Palin’s lean political action committee last week after completely misconstruing what Palin said at CPAC, where the former Alaska governor and Tea Party leader denounced the perm…

 

Top of Form

Like · · Follow PostUnfollow Post · Share · 4 hours ago

  • 2 people like this.

Christen Varley It will be really interesting to hear from this group net week, won’t it?

Despite the differences, if we don’t start talking to people outside our own group, we’ll never accomplish nothing. I’m looking forward to hearing what they have to say. After all, wasn’t the tea party formed to work outside the established party system as well? We don’t have to agree on every position but it is nice to know there has become.

4 hours ago · Like · 1

Michael McNeil I don’t know. The No Labels group is a far left group. Pretty sure they are using the Tea Party to push for their very liberal agenda. Have you looked at the people that belong to No Labels?

4 hours ago · Like

Christen Varley “Far left” is a mischaracterization – on any continuum. And so what if they are? Why is it a bad thing to let people hear what they have to say and decide for themselves? Sheesh! I really don’t understand this invented controversy. Since when has the tea party told people what they should think, what they should do, who they should listen to. GBTP has NEVER done that and isn’t starting now. Other TP leaders may think people need to be dictated to – GBTP doesn’t. Nobody gets harmed by hearing someone speak for 8 minutes out of two hours.

Finally, if someone who is in the tea party is duped into following an agenda that is contrary to limited government, personal responsibility and individual liberty, they’re not really “tea party” to begin with.

4 hours ago · Like

Michael McNeil Ron Shaich is a former Treasurer of the Massachusetts Democratic Party. And for what it is worth he was a delegate for George McGovern.

4 hours ago · Like

Christen Varley Good thing it will all be on video!!! maybe we’ll get lucky and the No Labels speaker will suggest we all joint the Communist party! That would be awesome!!!

4 hours ago · Like

Michael McNeil Funny you should mention communist…http://www.investingdaily.com/15390/panera-breads-communist-experiment/

 

Panera Bread’s Communist Experiment — PNRA, SBUX, DENN — Investing Daily

www.investingdaily.com

The bakery and restaurant chain’s efforts at doing good for society may end up harming shareholders.

4 hours ago · Like

Christen Varley I mentioned it on purpose. Cause all roads left lead to the communist party, ya’ know. ;) Hehehehehe!

3 hours ago · Like

Michael McNeil In certain cases they do…

3 hours ago · Like

Christine Morabito Surely you are not going to let the behavior of one individual in a group taint the whole group, are you? Haven’t we learned that with attacks on the Tea Party? If people do their research before blindly reposting they would see that No Labels promotes things like “No Budget, No Pay,” making the president have regular press conferences, having the president meet regularly with congressional leaders, making the parties pay for presidential fundraising, making the president appear before Congress for questioning on a regular basis, and making Congress work 5 days a week, three weeks a month, with one week then spent in the district.

3 hours ago · Like

Christen Varley Terrible, terrible people. ;)

So Christine, who are you working for today? Soros or the Koch bros? Hahahahaha!

3 hours ago · Like · 1

Christine Morabito Whoever will pay me!

3 hours ago · Like

Michael McNeil The co-founders of No Labels John Avolon and Ron Shaich are democratic party hacks. I’m not tainting the whole group by pointing that out, am I?

3 hours ago · Like · 1

Michael McNeil Anyway…sorry if I have angered you guys.

3 hours ago · Edited · Like

Christine Morabito You can find a conspiracy in anything if you look hard enough. I completely disagree that all Democrats are evil. Hey, some are even fiscally conservative. You know who else is fiscally conservative? The Tea Party!

3 hours ago · Like

Christen Varley Who is angry? I’ve been chuckling all morning. This is entertainment to me.

3 hours ago · Like · 1

Christen Varley Hey Christine, Didja’ buy that manse on the Cape yet? How’s your driver? Hehehe!

3 hours ago · Like · 1

Michael McNeil Well I’m glad your not upset.

3 hours ago · Like

Patrick Humphries If’s always funnier in Ohio :)

2 hours ago · Like · 1

Christen Varley Everything is funnier in Ohio!

2 hours ago · Like · 1

Jamison Tomasek OhHowIHateOhioState

7 minutes ago · Like

Avatar of admin

by admin

Locked & Loaded – Girl Dismantle Gun Control Argument In 3 Minutes! – Wake Up America

April 5, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, America's Collapse, Congress, Gun Control, Obama's America 2016, Politics, President Obama, Progressivism, United States Constitution, United States Sovereignty by admin

agirlANNAPOLIS, Md. –  Maryland’s  already-strong gun laws will become among the strictest in the nation with a  measure passed by the General Assembly Thursday, sending the bill to the  Democratic governor who proposed the legislation in the aftermath of December’s  massacre at a Newtown, Conn., elementary school.

The state Senate voted 28-19 for final passage, agreeing to a number of  changes the House of Delegates approved Wednesday.

The measure would require people who buy a handgun to submit fingerprints to  state police, bans 45 types of assault weapons, and limits gun magazines to 10  bullets. It also addresses firearms access for the mentally ill.

“Together, with a strong coalition of advocates, and the people of Maryland  who overwhelmingly support policies to reduce gun violence, we’ve chosen to take  action by advancing strategies that work to save lives,” Gov. Martin O’Malley  said in a statement after the vote.

Maryland will become the first state in nearly 20 years to require potential  handgun buyers to submit fingerprints to state police. Only five other states  have a similar requirement: Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York and New  Jersey.

Gun control advocates say the fingerprinting requirement will help keep guns  away from criminals, because it will make people reluctant to buy firearms for  those who are not allowed to have them. Opponents say the bill erodes Second  Amendment rights and ultimately penalizes law-abiding citizens without focusing  on lawbreakers.

Although the measure bans 45 types of assault weapons, people who own them  now will be able to keep them. People who order the weapons before Oct. 1, when  the law would take effect, also would be able to keep them.

People who have been involuntarily committed to a mental health facility  won’t be allowed to have a gun.

Critics noted that Maryland already has strong laws, including universal  background checks and a seven-day waiting period to buy a gun. The state doesn’t  even have a loophole allowing for private sales at gun shows without the same  background check that licensed dealers are required to obtain, said Sen. Allan  Kittleman, R-Howard.

Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/05/maryland-lawmakers-pass-strict-gun-control-bill/#ixzz2PahJclJl

Avatar of admin

by admin

UN Arms Treaty Approved – US Voted In Favor – Texas Atty Gen Ask Obama Not To Sign – Gun Control

April 2, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, Constitution, United Nations, United States Constitution, United States Sovereignty, US Sovereignty by admin

A Un Treaty2nd Amendment At Risk!!!!!!!
U.S.  Sovereignty At Risk – Treaties Supersede The Constitution!!!
UN Arms Treaty Approved – US Voted In Favor – Texas Atty Gen Wrote To Obama Ask Him Not To Sign – Gun Control

U.N. Treaty Seeks To Regulate Global Arms Trade – Firearms Registration? – Gun Control

 

Avatar of admin

by admin

GOAL Rally on the Common Wednesday April 3, 2013 in Support of the Second Amendment – Your 2nd Amendment At Risk!!

April 2, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Constitution, Constitutional, Gun Control, Nanny State, National Security, Obama's America 2016, Politics, United States Constitution, United States Sovereignty by admin

second-amendment-SC

Support – Defend – Speak Out – Take a Stand!

Information:

  • Date: Wednesday April 3, 2013
  • Time: 12:00 pm – 3:00 pm
  • Location: Start at Parkman Bandstand on the Boston Common (see google map below) event will proceed to the Massachusetts State House.
  • Transportation: MBTA Park Street Station on the Green Line.
  • Driving: Directions, click on “directions” on the google map below.
  • Guest speakers: Jim Wallace Executive Director of GOAL and more (TBA)!
  • Additional Information: Please email Angela Fisher
  • GOAL urges all affiliated clubs to organize a charter bus service to transport your membership to this rally!

Gun Control Debate – CT Lawmakers Agree To Strict Measures – 2nd Amendment At Risk!!

Gun Mandate – GA City Requires Homeowners Be Armed With Firearm & UN Treaty Alert!

UN adopts pact to regulate multibillion-dollar global arms trade
The U.N. General Assembly has overwhelmingly approved the first U.N. treaty  regulating the multibillion-dollar international arms trade.

The resolution adopting the landmark treaty was approved by a vote of 154 to  3 with 23 abstentions.

The 193-member world body voted after Iran, North Korea and Syria blocked its  adoption by consensus at a negotiating conference last Thursday. The three  countries voted “no” on the resolution.

The National Rifle Association has portrayed the draft treaty as a threat to  gun ownership rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and has lobbied to  defeat the proposal at the U.N. The NRA last week praised the Senate’s passage  of an amendment to the Democratic budget proposal that would prevent the U.S.  from entering into the treaty.

Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/04/02/un-adopts-pact-to-regulate-multibillion-dollar-global-arms-trade/#ixzz2PLP8YWJZ

 

Avatar of admin

by admin

2nd Amendment Rights Under Fire – U.N. Treaty & Firearm Registration – Gun Control

March 28, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Gun Control, Hope and Change, President Obama, United Nations, United States Constitution, United States Sovereignty by admin

Aaa UnUNITED NATIONS –  Supporters of a U.N.  treaty designed to regulate the multibillion-dollar global arms trade were  optimistic that a final draft circulated a day before Thursday’s deadline will  reach consensus.

Negotiators reconvened last week in a final attempt to reach a deal on the  Arms Trade Treaty, which would require all countries to establish national  regulations to control the transfer of conventional arms and to regulate arms  brokers.

U.N. diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity because negotiations have  been private, said Wednesday the United States was virtually certain to go along  with the latest text.

Hopes of reaching agreement on what would be a landmark treaty were dashed  last July when the U.S. said it needed more time to consider the proposed accord  — a move quickly backed by Russia and China. In December, the U.N. General  Assembly decided to hold a final conference and set Thursday as the deadline for  reaching agreement.

“We need a treaty,” China’s U.N. Ambassador Li Baodong told The Associated  Press. “We hope for consensus.”

Questions remain on whether Iran, Egypt, India and several other countries  that had serious concerns about the text would go along with the draft, which  requires agreement of all 193 U.N. member states for adoption.

There has never been an international treaty regulating the estimated $60  billion global arms trade. For more than a decade, activists and some  governments have been pushing for international rules to try to keep illicit  weapons out of the hands of terrorists, insurgent fighters and organized  crime.

“It’s important for each and every country in the world that we have a  regulation of the international arms trade,” Germany’s U.N. Ambassador Peter  Wittig told the AP. “There are still some divergencies of views, but I trust we  can overcome them.”

The draft treaty does not control the domestic use of weapons in any country,  but it would require all countries to establish national regulations to control  the transfer of conventional arms, parts and components and to regulate arms  brokers. It would prohibit states that ratify the treaty from transferring  conventional weapons if they would violate arms embargoes or if they would  promote acts of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes.

The final draft makes this human rights provision even stronger, adding that  the export of conventional arms should be prohibited if they could be used in  the commission of attacks on civilians or civilian buildings such as schools and  hospitals.

The National Rifle Association has portrayed the draft treaty as a threat to  gun ownership rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and has lobbied to  defeat the proposal at the U.N.

The NRA last week praised the Senate’s passage of an amendment to the  Democratic budget proposal that would prevent the U.S. from entering into the  treaty.

The measure, introduced by Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., passed on a 53-46  vote.

“Thanks to the efforts of Senator Inhofe, we are one step closer to ensuring  the U.N. will not trample on the freedoms our founding fathers guaranteed to  us,” Chris W. Cox, executive director of NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action,  said in a statement released following the vote.

Ammunition has been a key issue, with some countries pressing for the same  controls on ammunition sales as arms, but the U.S. and others opposed such tough  restrictions. The draft calls for each country that ratifies the treaty to  establish regulations for the export of ammunition “fired, launched or  delivered” by the weapons covered by the convention.

The Control Arms coalition, which represents about 100 organizations  worldwide campaigning for a strong treaty, and diplomats from countries that  support them, said this wouldn’t cover hand grenades and mines.

India and other countries had insisted that the treaty have an opt-out for  government arms transfers under defense cooperation agreements. The new text  appears to keep that loophole, stating that implementation of the treaty “shall  not prejudice obligations” under defense cooperation agreements by countries  that ratify the treaty.

“Making this treaty was like making a sausage: Everyone has added an  ingredient,” said Ted Bromund, a senior research fellow at The Heritage  Foundation, a conservative think tank.

“Unfortunately, that has produced a document that leans much too far towards  satisfying the concerns of the Arab Group and Mexico. The former view it as a  rebellion prevention plan, while the latter wants a text that edges towards its  view that the domestic firearms market in the U.S. should be subject to treaty  regulation,” he said.

But Daryl Kimball, executive director of the independent Washington-based  Arms Control Association, said, “The emerging treaty represents an important  first step in dealing with the unregulated and illicit global trade in  conventional weapons and ammunition, which fuels wars and human rights abuses  worldwide.”

He said the text could have been stronger and more comprehensive, but it can  still make an important difference.

“The new treaty says to every United Nations member that you cannot simply  ‘export and forget,’” Kimball said.

In considering whether to authorize the export of arms, the draft says a  country must evaluate whether the weapon would be used to violate international  human rights or humanitarian laws or be used by terrorists or organized crime.  The final draft would allow countries to determine whether the weapons transfer  would contribute to or undermine peace and security.

Anna Macdonald, Oxfam’s head of arms control, said the scope of the weapons  covered in the latest draft is still too narrow.

“We need a treaty that covers all conventional weapons, not just some of  them,” she said. “We need a treaty that will make a difference to the lives of  the people living in Congo, Mali, Syria and elsewhere who suffer each day from  the impacts of armed violence.”

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/28/optimism-in-un-on-global-arms-trade-treaty-as-us-is-said-to-go-along-with-deal/#ixzz2OpgaYDt8

Avatar of admin

by admin

Crisis In Europe – Protecting Your Hard-Earned Money – Wake Up America! – O’Reilly

March 26, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, America's Collapse, Bail Out, Congress, Debt Crisis, Economic Deception, Economy, Freedom, Obamanation, President Obama, Propaganda, Redistribution of Wealth, Socialism, Socialist, Speaker John Boehner, Tax Hike, Treason, US Sovereignty, Who Is Barack Hussein Obama? by admin

A A GreeceEuropean Union Authorize Seizure Of Money In Private Bank Account!

Nigel Farage: Now They Done It In One Country They are Quite Capable Of Do it In Italy Spain Portugal Or Anywhere Else & The Message That Sends To People That Has Saving In Bank In Those  Country, Certainly If I Was Them Is Get Your Money Out While You Can!!!

Could That Happen In The United State?

Crisis In Cyprus Sparking Fears About Bank Deposits Everywhere – Is Your Money Safe?  – Cavuto

 

 

 

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

The Last Vestige of a Free Press in America is Under Attack by Eric Holder on Behalf of BHO

March 19, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Abuse of Power, Amnesty, Constitution, Immigration, Liberty, Liberty in Jeopardy, President Obama, White House Fraud by Admin1

Remember This!

Chavez taking control of Venezuela’s media, according to report

Stay Connected

Free Press under AttackPosted on Friday, August 14, 2009

Juan O. Tamayo | The Miami Herald

An unclassified U.S. intelligence report says Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is “moving forcefully” to stifle media criticism by closing scores of radio stations, tightening controls on one TV station and maneuvering to seize control of another.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/08/14/73718/chavez-taking-control-of-venezuelas.html#storylink=cpy

So you believe that a Chavez like media take over  can’t happen here.

Barack Hussein Obama has his good friend and “Fast and Furious” gun running accomplice,  Attorney General Eric Holder seeking to destroy the Rupert Murdoch news empire so that the Fox Networks can be muzzled.

This may turn out to be the greatest threat to our liberty and consequently to our Constitution, since 911. If our “Dear Leader” and his minions are allowed to move forward on their Fascist policies and  to continue to deprive us of  our 2nd Amendment Rights, adopt United Nations Treaties and implement Amnesty without there being a vehicle or channel available for dissent, not only will Fox be muzzled but so will all  ‘Liberty-Loving Citizens”.

WE had better stand up to these bullies while we can. Call your Senators and Congressmen and tell them to demand that Attorney General Holder cease his witch hunt of News Corp and the Fox Networks. 

Holder Has Joined the War on Fox With Murdoch In His Sights

February 13, 2012

By 

 

Rupert Murdoch In Holder’s Sights

The War of Fox continues with attempts being made by our DOJ to dismantle and destroy Rupert Murdoch’s enterprise. Despite ample evidence that almost every news organization in Britain engaged in some type of hacking, the long arm of the Chicago thug, Eric Holder, is attempting to bring Murdoch under U.S. prosecutorial jurisdiction for alleged bribery under the Corrupt Practices Act.

Such a prosecution exposes Murdoch and his executives to fines of tens of millions of dollars and serious jail time.

Holder is attempting to make a connection between the News of the World hacking scandal in Britain and activities at the U.S. based Sun newspaper with the Operation Elevden arrests. Many view it as a witch hunt.

…The latest Operation Elveden arrests sharply increase the danger to News Corporation of potential multimillion dollar fines by US authorities as part of the continuing investigation into alleged bribery of public officials under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

The eight arrests escalate the FCPA crisis for the company by extending the allegations of bribery from the News of the World to the Sun newspaper, and by broadening its scope from police officers to other public officials. An official from the Ministry of Defence and a member of the armed forces were also arrested for alleged corruption and “misconduct in a public office”.

The threat of prosecution under the FCPA constitutes the greatest danger of the phone-hacking scandal for Rupert Murdoch‘s media empire. It could expose the company to tens of millions of dollars in fines and the risk of imprisonment of its executive officers.

It would also bring the scandal to America, which is the financial heart of the global company. News Corporation’s headquarters are on Manhattan’s Sixth Avenue, which is why the company is susceptible to the FCPA, a law introduced in the 1970s to hold US-based companies accountable for acts of bribery and corruption abroad.

Mike Koehler, an expert in FCPA law at Butler university, said Saturday’s arrests marked an escalation in the risk of an FCPA prosecution. “This spreads the alleged bribery to a completely different newspaper, to a different segment of the company and to other public officials,” he said.

Eric Holder, the US attorney general, launched a preliminary investigation into News Corporation’s activities last July. The FBI is known to be involved in the investigation on both sides of the Atlantic…Read here: Guardian UK

It is amazing how Holder has the time to do this while destroying Swiss banks and covering up Fast & Furious.

Read more here: http://www.independentsentinel.com/2012/02/holder-has-joined-the-war-on-fox-with-murdoch-in-his-sights/


 

 

Avatar of admin

by admin

It’s Good To Be King! – Obama Refuse To Eat Without Food Tester? – Wake Up America!!!!

March 16, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, Abuse of Power, Obama's America 2016, Obamanation, President Obama by admin

a kingWASHINGTON — Following President Obama’s lunch meeting with Senate  Republicans on Capitol Hill, Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins described  the food served and said the president was not able to eat since his “taster”  was not present.

“University of Maine recipe for healthy lobster salad — I pointed that out to  the president in keeping with the first lady’s initiatives and Fox Family Potato  Chips made in Aroostook County where I’m from and wild blueberry pie full of  anti-oxidants, see this was a healthy lunch as well. We did have a little ice  cream on the  pie too, also made in Maine, Gifford’s Ice Cream. So in all seriousness this was  well received,” Collins told reporters on Thursday after the meeting at the  Capitol.

“Unfortunately, you know, the president can’t,” said Collins when asked if  Obama ate at the lunch meeting.

Read more:  http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/14/obama-couldnt-eat-at-hill-meeting-without-taster-audio/#ixzz2NhzRdoRn

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

Don’t Allow Colorado’s Blatantly Unconstitutional Gun Laws to Become a Harbinger for MA

March 5, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Abuse of Power, Constitutional, Deval Patrick, Founding Principles, Freedom, Generational Theft, Liberty, Liberty in Jeopardy, MA, Obamanation, Political Deception, Political Incompetence, President Obama, United States Constitution, US Sovereignty by Admin1

Judge NapolitanoOUR Declaration of Independence states that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1523:

Consequently, one  can not surrender, sell or transfer unalienable rights. They are a gift from the creator to the individual and can not under any circumstances be surrendered or taken.  All individual’s have unalienable rights.

Our Second Amendment states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

There are today, people in our country,  who are attempting to infringe upon our right to keep and bear arms and would thereby place our personal safety, our family’s safety  and our country’s safety in jeopardy of being overrun by criminality and anarchists.  However, our forefathers understood that our right to bear arms is  so basic and intrinsic a right that not even Government can not eradicate it.  Consequently, we have  an obligation to future generations to guard this right jealously from Federal encroachment by Barack Hussein Obama and State encroachment by Deval Patrick and his minions in our Legislature.

The following are but a few of the multitude of writings by our forefathers regarding this subject:

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms… disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. …Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.–Thomas Jefferson, quoting with approval a noted criminologist of his day.

“Americans have the right and advantage of being armed – unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.” (James Madison, The Federalist Papers #46 at 243-244)

“…to disarm the people – that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” (George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 380) 

Today Megan Kelly talked to Judge Andrew Napolitano about Colorado’s blatantly unconstitutional gun law proposals:

Megan Kelly:  Colorado is becoming a hot spot in the fight over second Amendment Rights today after a legislative committee approves a controversial bill that would make weapons manufacturers and sellers liable for crimes committed with their guns.

This legislation would become one of the most dramatic gun laws in the country and is polarizing the state. The lawmakers in Colorado believe that they have the votes. And what they are trying to do is impose criminal liability or civil liability?

Judge Andrew Napolitano:  Civil liability for the manufacturer or the re-seller if the gun is used to commit a crime .

Megan Kelly:  So  if I have I’m in a gun shop business  and  I got a gun shop and I sell someone a gun and they use it and kill somebody, I could  potentially get sued as the gun shop owner?

Judge Andrew Napolitano:  Yes, as is could the manufacturer from whom you bought the gun.  And if the person to whom you sold it sells it to another person, then the person to whom you sold it could be liable for the criminal behavior of the ultimate user. That’s why you heard in one of the clips you just ran, police saying, police testifying at this hearing; this is un- enforceable. You can’t possibly impose a burden on on-d the third person down the line.

Megan Kelly:  How far down the line can you go?

Judge Andrew Napolitano:  Think about it. Can we , we hold General Motors liable because an automobile kills someone even if its used recklessly, even if it’s used criminally? Of course not! We just don’t do that in America. This transference of liability is basically wrong and unfair.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

12 Things That Just Happened That Show The Next Wave Of The Economic Collapse Is Almost Here

March 4, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, Abuse of Power, America's Collapse, America's Heritage, Congress, Constitution, Cooking the Books, Deval Patrick, Economic Deception, Generational Theft, Gun Control, Intimidation, Liars, Liberty, Liberty in Jeopardy, Obamanation, Patriotism, Political Deception, Political Incompetence, President Obama, Propaganda, Quantitative Easing, Sequestration, US Sovereignty by Admin1

Mark SteynOur government is lying to us. The reason Barack Hussein Obama began his strategy of “Blame” over “Sequestration” is because he knows that the economic collapse of the US economy is coming and he needs a scapegoat! His “full court press” in the media is perpetuating his grievous “lie” that an “Itsy Bitsy Teeny Weeny” Sequestration cut will cause catastrophic damage to our economy.

Besides the following article, other independent economists, who, using the same data as our US Bureau of  Labor Statistics reach the entirely different conclusion that our unemployment rates are INCREASING, not DECREASING. 

Thomas Jefferson said that, To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us down with perpetual debt….I am for a government rigorously frugal and simple.”  We have thrown his warnings to the wind and now because of our economic gluttony of QE1, QE2, QE3, QE4 etc., face the loss of our Independence and sovereignty as well. 

Folks, an economic collapse will place our  Bill of Rights and our Constitution in grave jeopardy! The dumbing down of  our last generation has left them without an understanding of the source of the Rights  that they enjoy.

Without the Bill of Rights,  our 2nd Amendment and our ability to protect and preserve our Constitution and our “Natural Rights” will be abolished.  All of the proposed  State and Federal Gun Laws being proposed would have practically no affect on stopping incidents like Newtown while having a vital affect on our Constitutional right to preserve and protect our families and country.   

This is a time for action! Don’t allow either the Obama or  the Patrick Administrations to take away any more of your Constitutional Rights! Call your State and Senators and representatives and tell them NO on Unconstitutional Gun Control measures and  on our “drunken sailor” Spending. 

12 Things That Just Happened That Show The Next Wave Of The Economic Collapse Is Almost Here

 By Michael, on March 3rd, 2013�

12 Things That Just Happened That Show The Next Wave Of The Economic Collapse Is Almost HereAre we running out of time?  For the last several years, we have been living in a false bubble of hope that has been fueled by massive amounts of debt and bailout money.  This illusion of economic stability has convinced most people that the great economic crisis of 2008 was just an “aberration” and that now things are back to normal.  Unfortunately, that is not the case at all.  The truth is that the financial crash of 2008 was just the first wave of our economic troubles.  We have not even come close to recovering from that wave, and the next wave of the economic collapse is rapidly approaching.  Our economy is like a giant sand castle that has been built on a foundation of debt and toilet paper currency.  As each wave of the crisis hits us, the solutions that our leaders will present to us will involve even more debt and even more money printing.  And each time, those “solutions” will only make our problems even worse.  Right now, events are unfolding in Europe and in the United States that are pushing us toward the next major crisis moment.  I sincerely hope that we have some more time before the next crisis overwhelms us, but as you will see, time is rapidly running out.

The following are 12 things that just happened that show the next wave of the economic collapse is almost here…

#1 According to TrimTab’s CEO Charles Biderman, corporate insider purchases of stock have hit an all-time low, and the ratio of corporate insider selling to corporate insider buying has now reached an astounding 50 to 1….

While retail is being told to buy-buy-buy, Biderman exclaims that “insiders at U.S. companies have bought the least amount of shares in any one month,” and that the ratio of insider selling to buying is now 50-to-1 – a monthly record.

#2 On Friday we learned that personal income in the United States experienced its largest one month decline in 20 years

Personal income decreased by $505.5 billion in January, or 3.6%, compared to December (on a seasonally adjusted and annualized basis). That’s the most dramatic decline since January 1993, according to the Commerce Department.

#3 In a stunning move, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder says that he will appoint an emergency financial manager to take care of Detroit’s financial affairs…

Snyder, 54, took a step he avoided a year ago, empowering an emergency financial manager who can sweep aside union contracts, sell municipal assets, restructure services and reorder finances. He announced the move yesterday at a public meeting in Detroit.

If this does not work, Detroit will almost certainly have to declare bankruptcy.  If that happens, it will be the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history.

#4 On Friday it was announced that the unemployment rate in Italy had risen to 11.7 percent.  That was a huge jump from 11.3 percent the previous month, and Italy now has the highest unemployment rate that it has experienced in 21 years.

#5 The youth unemployment rate in Italy has risen to a new all-time record high of 38.7 percent.

#6 On Friday it was announced that the unemployment rate in the eurozone as a whole had just hit a brand new record high of 11.9 percent.

#7 On Friday it was announced that the unemployment rate in Greece has now reached 27 percent, and it is being projected that it will reach30 percent by the end of the year.

#8 The youth unemployment rate in Greece is now an almost unbelievable 59.4 percent.

#9 On Saturday, hundreds of thousands of protesters filled the streets of Lisbon and other Portuguese cities to protest the austerity measures that are being imposed upon them.  It was reportedly the largest protest in the history of Portugal.

#10 According to Goldman Sachs, bank deposits declined all over Europe during the month of January.

#11 Over the weekend, the deputy governor of China’s central bank declared that China is prepared for a “currency war“…

A top Chinese banker said Beijing is “fully prepared” for a currency war as he urged the world to abide by a consensus reached by the G20 to avert confrontation, state media reported on Saturday.

Yi Gang, deputy governor of China’s central bank, issued the call after G20 finance ministers last month moved to calm fears of a looming war on the currency markets at a meeting in Moscow.

Those fears have largely been fuelled by the recent steep decline in the Japanese yen, which critics have accused Tokyo of manipulating to give its manufacturers a competitive edge in key export markets over Asian rivals.

#12 Italy is an economic basket case at this point, and the political gridlock in Italy is certainly not helping matters.  Former comedian Beppe Grillo’s party could potentially tip the balance of power one way or the other in Italy, and over the weekend he made some comments that are really shaking things up over in Europe.  For one thing, he is suggesting that Italy should hold a referendum on the euro…

“I am a strong advocate of Europe. I am in favor of an online referendum on the euro,” Beppe Grillo told Bild am Sonntag.

Such a vote would not be legally binding in Italy, where referendums can only be used to repeal laws or parts of laws, but would carry political weight. Grillo has said in the past that membership of the euro should be up to the Italian people.

In addition, Grillo is also suggesting that Italy’s debt has gotten so large that renegotiation is the only option…

In an interview with a German magazine published on Saturday, Mr Grillo said that “if conditions do not change” Italy “will want” to leave the euro and return to its former national currency.

The 64-year-old comic-turned-political activist also said Italy needs to renegotiate its €2 trillion debt.

At 127 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), it is the highest in the euro zone after Greece.

“Right now we are being crushed, not by the euro, but by our debt. When the interest payments reach €100 billion a year, we’re dead. There’s no alternative,” he told Focus, a weekly news magazine.

He said Italy was in such dire economic straits that “in six months, we will no longer be able to pay pensions and the wages of public employees.”

And of course government debt has taken center stage in the United States as well.

The sequester cuts have now gone into effect, and they will definitely have an effect on the U.S. economy.  Of course that effect will not be nearly as dramatic as many Democrats are suggesting, but without a doubt those cuts will cause the U.S. economy to slow down a bit.

And of course the U.S. economy has already been showing plenty of signs of slowing down lately.  If you doubt this, please see my previous article entitled “Consumer Spending Drought: 16 Signs That The Middle Class Is Running Out Of Money“.

So what comes next?

Well, everyone should keep watching Europe very closely, and it will also be important to keep an eye on Wall Street.  There are a whole bunch of indications that the stock market is at or near a peak.  For example, just check out what one prominent stock market analyst recently had to say

“Every reliable technical tool is warning of major peaking action,” said Walter Zimmerman, the senior technical analyst at United-ICAP. “This includes sentiment, momentum, classical chart patterns, and Elliott wave analysis.

“Most of the rally in the stock market since 2009 can be chalked up to the Federal Reserve’s attempt to create a ‘wealth effect’ through higher stock market prices. This only exacerbates the downside risk. Why? The stock market no is longer a lead indicator for the economy. It is instead reflecting  Fed manipulation. Pushing the stock market higher while the real economy languishes has resulted in another bubble.

“The next leg down will not be a partial correction of the advance since the 2009 lows. It will be another major financial crisis. The worst is yet to come.”

Sadly, most people will continue to deny that anything is wrong until it is far too late.

Many areas of Europe are already experiencing economic depression, and it is only a matter of time before the U.S. follows suit.

Time is running out, and I hope that you are getting ready.

So what do you think?

How much time do you believe that we have left before the next wave of the economic collapse strikes?

 

Jeff Rowley Big Wave Surfer wipeout Photo Jaws Peahi by Xvolution Media

Read more at:  http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/


 

 

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

Obama’s Support for UN Gun Treaty Could Fundamentally Change American Gun Laws and Threaten our Second Amendment Rights

March 3, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, Abuse of Power, America's Heritage, Constitutional, Freedom, Liberty in Jeopardy, Obamanation, President Obama, President Ronald Reagan, Treason, Treaties, United Nations by Admin1

2nd Amendment The nine  most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the  government and I’m here to help.’

Ronald Reagan Quote on American Government’s Bureaucracy
40th president of US 

 

The nine most reassuring words in the English language are,  I’m from the UN and I’m here to help.

Barack Hussein Obama’s Conviction on Global Government’s Paternity
44th president of US

Obama continues his propaganda Blitzkrieg against America, American values and our Constitution’s Bill of Rights. Whether it’s his lies about  Sequestration, about Fast and Furious, about Benghazi or about UN Treaties. Whether it’s his pitting of men against women, young against old,  poor against rich, or  one race against another,  his narcissist arrogance isn’t phased in the least.

“I mean the fact is the UN doesn’t protect people it doesn’t save the innocent . I mean you can stack to the ceiling the bodies of the innocent [a] thousand times over that the UN has failed to protect.  The dead people don’t get to vote on this UN treaty and Americans don’t want to be added to that pile of dead people that have been left defenseless by the UN policies.”

Wayne LaPierre                                                                                                                                                           Executive Vice-President and chief Executive Officer                                                                                                     National Rifle Association

Leaving nothing to chance, Obama is pursuing a multi-pronged Blitzkrieg against our 2nd Amendment. “While many states are taking steps to expand gun rights, the Federal Government is moving the other way.  President Obama is even using the nation’s premier public health agency to further the agenda.”


Still think you can trust the government, police and military....better think again!

DEMOCIDE: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns And Freedom

depicts what could happen to a disarmed America!
This will scare the hell out of you!!

Warning Viewer Discretion advised for the following graphic video!


 

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

Is US Concealed Carry in Jeopardy?

February 25, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, America's Heritage, Congress, Gun Control, President Obama, Supreme Court, United States Constitution by Admin1

siSigners“The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.”
– Zacharia Johnson, delegate to Virginia Ratifying Convention

John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and  Zacharia Johnson would be surprised and amazed by the shenanigans being perpetrated against our 2nd Amendment Rights.

The following is extracted from Wikipedia:

Prior to the 1897 supreme court case Robertson v. Baldwin, the federal courts had been silent on the issue of concealed carry. In the dicta from a maritime law case the Supreme Court commented that state laws restricting concealed weapons do not infringe upon the right to bear arms protected by the Federal Second Amendment.[58]

In the majority decision in the 2008 Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. Heller, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote;

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues … The majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues.”[59]

Heller was a landmark case because for the first time in United States history a Supreme Court decision defined the right to bear arms as constitutionally guaranteed to private citizens rather than a right restricted to “well regulated militia[s]“. The Justices asserted that sensible restrictions on the right to bear arms are constitutional however an outright ban on a specific type of firearm, in this case handguns, was in fact unconstitutional. The decision is limited because it only applies to federal enclaves such as the District of Columbia.

On June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the handgun ban enacted by the city of Chicago, Illinois, in McDonald v. Chicago, effectively extending the Heller decision to states and local governments nationwide.[60] Banning handguns in any jurisdiction has the effect of rendering invalid any licensed individual’s right to carry concealed in that area except for federally exempted retired and current law enforcement officers and other government employees acting in the discharge of their official duties.

In a sweeping ruling on a Colorado case, the Tenth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decreed that there is no Second Amendment right to carry a concealed firearm in public. The broad wording of the decision in Peterson v. Martinez creates a far-reaching national precedent against carrying a loaded handgun outside the home.

consequently, one can be fairly certain that this case will make its way to the Supreme court. A court that in 2008 created the legal fiat that “Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited.”

Should we be worried about a Supreme Court Decision? You betcha!

Remember what happened with ObamaCare! We can’t always trust the courts anymore because they have been packed with incompetent, unprincipled ideologues that can be easily manipulated  When the Progressives can’t get their way with legislation, they use the courts to bypass the will of the people.

If Barack Hussein Obama has the opportunity to choose a Supreme Court Justice before this case is heard, our Second Amendment Rights will be in serious jeopardy!

 

 

 

 

 

Avatar of carlos

by carlos

Justice For Gun Owners – You Are Racist & Corrupt If You Support The 2nd Amendment – Jeanine Pirro Weighs In!

February 24, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, America's Collapse, Gun Control, President Obama, United States Constitution by carlos

Chicago CopChicago Police Superintendent Says You Are Racist & Corrupt If You Support The 2nd Amendment Or  If You Support Any Politian That Supports The 2nd Amendment!
Justice For Gun Owners – You Are Racist & Corrupt If You Support The 2nd Amendment – Jeanine Pirro Weighs In!
Unbelievable!!!!!

Chicago’s Top Cop: The Racist Roots of Gun Rights?

July 5, 2011

(GunReports.com) — Chicago Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy, newly appointed by anti-gun Mayor Rahm Emanuel, has wasted no time in sharing his views on Chicagoans’ individual right to keep and bear arms, the NRA-ILA reports.

Less than a month after his approval by the City Council, McCarthy attended a service at St. Sabina’s Church (a parish led by anti-gun extremist Father Michael Pfleger) and made a speech claiming that a lack of restrictive gun control laws is “government sponsored racism.”

Those with a better understanding of history will find themselves confused trying to interpret McCarthy’s logic, as decades of scholarship have proven just the opposite; that gun control, rather than its absence, has often been used as a means of government sponsored racism.

In his 1995 Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy article, “The Racist Roots of Gun Control,” Second Amendment scholar Clayton E. Cramer outlines the historical case that “racism underlies gun control laws.” Cramer notes that racist gun control in America stretches as far back as 1751 with a French law in the Louisiana territory that required colonists to “‘[i]f necessary,’ beat ‘any black carrying any potential weapon, such as a cane.’”

Though Superintendent McCarthy might be excused for not looking that far back, he should certainly be aware of last year’s U.S. Supreme Court opinion in the case of McDonald v. Chicago.  In a concurring opinion in that case, Justice Clarence Thomas explained that in the years preceding the Civil War, “Many legislatures amended their laws prohibiting slaves from carrying firearms to apply the prohibition to free blacks as well.” After the Civil War, little improved.  Justice Thomas writes: “Some States formally prohibited blacks from possessing firearms… Others enacted legislation prohibiting blacks from carrying firearms without a license, a restriction not imposed on whites.”

Other Reconstruction Era (and later) laws were less candid. For example, an 1870 Tennessee law barred the sale of all but the most expensive pistols, effectively disarming newly freed blacks and the poor.  New York’s Sullivan Law of 1911, requiring a permit for handgun possession, was largely targeted at Italians and other disfavored immigrant groups. (That law is still on the books.)  And the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was denied a concealed carry permit in Alabama under a similar discretionary permitting law—even after his house had been bombed.

We suggest that in the future, Superintendent McCarthy might do a little more research before conflating respect for a fundamental individual right with its antithesis, government-sponsored racism.

http://www.gunreports.com/news/news/Chicago-Top-Cop-The-Racist-Roots-of-Gun-Rights_3148-1.html?CMP=OTC-RSS

Avatar of carlos

by carlos

Ladies You Don’t Need A Gun! – Grab Your Whistle!!! – Gun Control! Unbelievable!!!

February 19, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, Gun Control, Hope and Change, United States Constitution by carlos

ladiesYesterday afternoon video of Colorado Democrat Rep. Joe Salazar was released from a hearing in which he was arguing for the disarmament of college students (HB13-1226).

Ladies You Don’t Need A Gun! – Grab Your Whistle!!! – Gun Control!  Unbelievable!!!

His comments, oddly, were aimed particularly towards women on college campus. When statistics show that  one in four collegiate women report rape and one in five are raped, Salazar may want to pick a different segment of the population to focus on when trying to make the ridiculous case you’re about to see below.

Controversy Over A Woman’s Right To Defend Herself With A Firearm – Megyn Kelly

Avatar of carlos

by carlos

Own A Gun? – State Consider Mandating Firearm Insurance! – Gun Control! – Unconstitutional!

February 6, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Gun Control by carlos

Gun InsuranceThey Are Looking For A Way To Infringe On Your Constitutional Rights! – Wake Up America!

BOSTON —  As lawmakers cast around for ways to curb gun-related violence, some are hoping the insurance market might offer incentives.

A bill filed Friday in Massachusetts would require gun owners to purchase liability insurance in the event that a firearm is used to injure.

The insurance policies would give those injured by a weapon a legal recourse, backers of the bill say, but they also would create financial incentives that could reduce accidents and fatalities. Gun owners, for example, might see lower insurance rates if they agreed to take firearms training courses and properly stored their weapons.

“Insurance companies were able to discourage smoking through the marketplace and make cars safer through the marketplace,” said state Rep. David Linsky, the bill’s sponsor.

And insurers have more leeway than law enforcement in some cases, he said.

Massachusetts already has gun storage laws, but police cannot come into a person’s home without a warrant, Linsky pointed out. An insurance company, however, would be able to verify that there is proper gun storage before writing a policy.

Officials at the National Conference of State Legislatures say that, to their knowledge, no state has adopted a gun insurance requirement.

The idea is already meeting with resistance from gun rights advocates, who say it amounts to more regulation aimed at law-abiding gun owners.

“Now we’re going to have insurance companies telling us how we are supposed to be trained and where we are going to store our guns?” said Jim Wallace, executive director of the Gun Owners Action League in Massachusetts.

Craig Baenziger, who works at a gun- and ammunition-seller in North Attleboro called Northeast Trading Co., said requiring liability insurance for guns makes little sense because it targets people who buy the weapons legally instead of going after criminals who illegally possess them.

“Insurance on your gun isn’t really going to decrease crime or accidents. Nobody shoots their friend on purpose. It’s not going to do anything,” Baenziger said. “It’s just a way to increase revenue for the state.”

But supporters say requiring liability insurance could cut down on accidents, because gun owners who store their weapons safely would pay less for their insurance. It could also curb the flow of illegal guns because insurance policies would reward owners who secure weapons against theft.

Other recent gun-control proposals being pushed in the wake of the shootings at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., have focused more directly on banning the sale or possession of certain weapons.

President Barack Obama is pushing a series of steps including requiring background checks on all gun sales, reinstating the ban on guns classified as assault weapons and renewing a 10-round limit on the size of ammunition magazines.

By Steve LeBlanc THE ASSOCIATED PRESS http://www.telegram.com/article/20130119/NEWS/101199988/1052

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

Testimony You Won’t See On CNN or Read About in the Boston Globe or NY Times

January 29, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, Gun Control, Lamestream Media by Admin1

Mark Mattioli, the father of  Sandy Hook Elementary shooting victim James Mattioli,  gave moving testimony in front of a Hartford Connecticut Gun Violence Task Force. A couple of  quoted highlights that you will not see in the lamestream media follow.

Mark stated that, “I think that there is much more promise for a solution in identifying, researching and creating solutions along the lines of mental health issues. I think there is a lot of work that can be done there. “

“The Problem is not Gun Laws.”

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

2nd Amendment Opponent Mayor Bloomberg’s Armed Security Accosts Journalist

January 29, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Abuse of Power, Anarchy, Constitutional, Founding Principles, Gun Control, Political Class, Political Deception by Admin1

Our country has now evolved such that there are one set of rules for our new elite “Ruling Political Class” and another for us, the  new common “Serfs Class”.

Our Political Class has become a do as I say not as I do elite.  Rabid anti-gun Anti-2nd Amendment Mayor Michael Bloomberg surrounded by 5 hefty security guards , leaving a conference, is asked a gun control question by a reporter,  Jason Matter, who was also an attendee. Jason is immediately accosted by Bloomberg’s  guards  and then the guards  continue to harass and intimidate him even after he walks away down the street.

 

 

HUMAN EVENTS BLOG

GOOD NEWS: MAYOR BLOOMBERG’S JOURNALIST REPELLENT SYSTEM IS WORKING PERFECTLY

By:  John Haywood
1/28/2013 12:55 PM

My old friend Jason Mattera, now with the Andrea Tantaros show, participated in a stress test of New York mayor Michael Bloomberg’s journalist repellent systems, and I’m pleased to report that the system is functioning beautifully.  The Mayor is protected from a number of things he would prefer his citizens remain vulnerable to, including impertinent questions.  He doesn’t seem any more eager to declare his own personal “gun-free zone” than most other gun control zealots, but he’s strongly in favor of journalism-free zones:

You can tell Jason is mellowing out, because in his wild youth he would have done the interview with a Big Gulp in his hand.  If he gets a chance to conduct a follow-up interview, I’m hoping he’ll ask if Bloomberg has ever participated in Barack Obama’s “frequent skeet shoots,” which I believe look something like this:

It’s remarkable how reliably the “why won’t you disarm your bodyguards?” question discombobulates the anti-Second Amendment crowd.  They really don’t have a comfortable focus-group-friendly answer to it.  The coldly logical responses – “because I’m more important than you, so I need protection” – simply do not sit well with the public.  That includes people who might otherwise be content to ride in the gun-control bandwagon, until they hit this particular intellectual speed bump.

The question is not, “Why should you have a professional security detail while I must defend myself?”  If that were the issue at hand, it wouldn’t be tough to answer the question.  Instead, the ruling class finds it difficult to explain why they should enjoy armed protection while the rest of us are forbidden to defend ourselves at all, or must do so within an environment of complex restrictions that put us at a pronounced disadvantage against attackers.  This position might be easier to defend if the Little People faced no significant risk of criminal attack, but that’s obviously not the case.  It’s especially obvious if you know more about the recent history of law-abiding citizens defending themselves with firearms than the national media wants you to know.

Serious students of American liberty read the Second Amendment and see the right of individual citizens to defend themselves, and their families, against tyranny and barbarism.  It is increasingly offensive to hear people with armed security details lecture us on how it’s really more like a provisional license to shoot ducks and clay pigeons.

Update: You’ll have to make do with the artistic representation of Obama’s frequent skeet shooting sessions provided by Messrs. Brooks and Korman, because the White House refuses to provide photos of our gun-slinging President filling the sky with hot lead.

 

Read the entire post and comments here: http://www.humanevents.com/2013/01/28/good-news-mayor-bloombergs-journalist-repellent-system-is-working-perfectly/


 

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

In the Throes of Anarchy – Obama’s Union-Controlled NLRB Thumbs Nose At Court Ruling

January 28, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, America's Collapse, Amnesty, Anarchy, Constitution, Freedom, Obamanation, Political Courage, Political Deception, President Obama, The Grand Deception, US Military by Admin1

“Time and again President Obama has chosen to govern through executive fiat, and today a federal court has taken action to help rein in this abuse of power. The Obama labor board must cease all activity until qualified nominees have been constitutionally appointed to the board. Any attempt to continue this battle in federal court will only prolong the uncertainty the president’s unilateral action has created for America’s workers and job creators.”    

The  above statement released  by U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chairman John Kline (R-MN) and Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions Chairman Phil Roe (R-TN) and the following is but just another example of how  the Barack Hussein Obama Administration is placing OUR Constitution  and our Natural Rights under SIEGE.

The  2012 National Defense Authorization Act now  allows the military to detain without a trial any American Citizen accused of being a terrorist, or of supporting terrorists who plot attacks against the United States. Just imagine  how this provision could be used against the Tea Party, for example, who have been deemed “Terrorists” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. In the following video, a prominent director with the Southern Poverty Law Center speaking to a group of university students, stated in October 2012 that  parts of the Tea Party group are “filled with racists.”

The Obama Administration is implementing  a program of incremental  disembowelment of our Constitution and especially our Bill of Rights.  His attacks are not limited to our Constitution and our Bill of Rights. Barack Hussein Obama has now instituted a new litmus test for our Military’s Top Brass:  

    “Will You Fire on American Citizens?”

Obama’s incremental disembowelment and  usurpations of power  will continue until  “We the People” develop the Political Will and Political Courage to seize back our Constitution and our Country.

Obama’s Union-Controlled NLRB Thumbs Nose At Court Ruling, Chairman Vows To March Onward

By: LaborUnionReport (Diary)  |  January 25th, 2013 at 09:15 PM  |

NLRB-picketing
Following Friday morning’s appeals court ruling that Barack Obama’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were unconstitutional, union attorney (and current NLRB chairman) Mark Gaston Pearce vowed to ignore the court’s ruling.

In a statement posted on the NLRB’s website, Pearce stated:

“The Board respectfully disagrees with today’s decision and believes that the President’s position in the matter will ultimately be upheld. It should be noted that this order applies to only one specific case, Noel Canning, and that similar questions have been raised in more than a dozen cases pending in other courts of appeals.

In the meantime, the Board has important work to do. The parties who come to us seek and expect careful consideration and resolution of their cases, and for that reason, we will continue to perform our statutory duties and issue decisions.”

“The parties who come to us seek and expect careful consideration and resolution of their cases…”

Wait. What?!?

Mr. Pearce must be referring to union bosses ‘expecting careful consideration’ with his statement, because he surely couldn’t mean employers expect careful consideration before the union-controlled NLRB.

Heck, the vast majority of employers already know they face not much more than a kangaroo court with the NLRB.

That’s the reason so many employers are having to appeal their cases to the circuit courts these days.

Related:

______________________

“Truth isn’t mean. It’s truth.”
Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)

Get LUR updates on Twitter.

Tags: Mark PearceNational Labor Relations BoardNLRB

Avatar of carlos

by carlos

Gun Control – Hypocrisy On The Hill – Gov’t Officials Won’t Be Affected By Gun Ban

January 27, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Gun Control, Obama's America 2016, President Obama by carlos

Gun HGun Control – Hypocrisy On The Hill – Gov’t Officials Exempt From Feinstein’s Bill
Gun Control – Hypocrisy On The Hill – Gov’t Officials Won’t Be Affected By Gun Ban
Lawmaker Want To Be Able To Protect Their Families, But Want To Take Away Your Right To Protect Your Families!

I Guess They Are More Important Then We are!

Are “Gun Free Zones” Really An Invitation To Kill People? – Huckabee

Gun Myths Debunked – Up In Arms Gun Control Debate Heats Up – Jessie Duff -Jeanine Pirro

 

Avatar of carlos

by carlos

2nd Amendment Under Attack – More Detail NRA Responds To Sweeping New Gun Control – Megyn Kelly

January 24, 2013 in 2nd Amendment, Gun Control, National Security, Obama's America 2016, Political Correctness, President Obama, Socialist, The Hope and The Change by carlos

gun bDemocrats introduce expanded  assault-weapons ban

Published January 24, 2013 FoxNews.com

Congressional Democrats introduced a new and broader assault-weapons ban  Thursday, in a vivid press conference that included a display of various weapons  they want to outlaw.

It was a measure that was quickly condemned by the National Rifle Association  as an assault on the Constitution, “instead of prosecuting criminals or fixing  our broken mental health system.”

“The American people know gun bans do not work and we are confident Congress  will reject Senator Feinstein’s wrong-headed approach,” spokeswoman Andrew  Arulanandam said.

The measure was written by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who was behind  the original 1994 assault-weapons ban which expired in 2004. It marks the first  major legislative step since President Obama, in the wake of the Newtown school  shooting, called for new gun control measures including a new and stronger  assault-weapons ban.

“Our weak gun laws allow these mass killings to be carried out again, and  again, and again in our country,” Feinstein said. “Weapons, designed originally  for the military to kill large numbers of people in close combat, are replicated  for civilian use.”

She said the bill she and her colleagues are introducing would bar the “sale,  transfer, manufacture and importation” of assault weapons. It would also ban  magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.

As part of the press conference, lawmakers displayed an array of weapons,  including a Colt AR-15, a semi-automatic assault rifle, and an Intratec TEC-9, a  semi-automatic handgun.

The move comes after NBC News host David Gregory faced an investigation for  displaying a banned magazine on a Sunday show in the District — but the Senate  sergeant-at-arms office said the weapons were displayed Thursday in “compliance”  with all applicable laws.

The office said they are “authentic” and in the custody of the Philadelphia  and D.C. police departments, which brought them.

The weapons ban, though, faces long odds even after last month’s mass school  shooting in the state of Connecticut.

In a statement, Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said the proposal would have  done “nothing” to prevent the Newtown tragedy and vowed to fight to defeat the  bill.

“Washington politicians shouldn’t be taking advantage of recent tragedy to  try to push an aggressive gun control agenda. Real assault weapons — machine  guns — are already functionally illegal, and they have been since 1934,” he  said.

The last ban expired in 2004 when Congress refused to renew it under pressure  from the National Rifle Association, a gun advocacy group. There’s continuing  disagreement about the effectiveness of the original assault-weapons ban, and  measures like beefed-up background checks on gun sales may be more likely to  pass.

Definitions of what qualifies as an assault weapon have varied over time and  across states.

According to a summary from Feinstein’s office, her bill would place bans on  120 “specifically named firearms,” as well as certain other semiautomatic guns  — and those with a fixed magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds.

While the 1994 law defined an assault weapon as one that had, in most cases,  a detachable magazine and at least two characteristics as set by Congress, the  new bill would define an assault weapon as one that meets just one of those  characteristics.

Some of those characteristics for rifles in the old law included a pistol  grip, a folding stock and a bayonet mount. But the Feinstein bill would strip  what her office describes as “easy-to-remove” characteristics like the bayonet  mount from that list.

Feinstein’s office says the bill would grandfather in weapons legally owned  before enactment and exempt more than 900 “specifically named weapons” for  hunting or sporting purposes.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/24/democrats-reintroduce-assault-weapons-ban/#ixzz2IwipLnPB

Avatar of Admin1

by Admin1

” think the president’s program is false, misleading and to some extent Unconstitutional.”- Rudy Giuliani

January 20, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Abuse of Power, Constitutional, Freedom, Gun Control, Liberty in Jeopardy, Obamanation, President Obama, The Hope and The Change, Who Is Barack Hussein Obama? by Admin1

clipFormer New York Mayor, Rudy Giuliani says, “Gun Control affects the ‘good guys”. The bad guys aren’t affected by gun control. You tell them they can’t have an assault weapon. They say go to hell. We’re going to have our Assault weapons.  You say the magazine should only be 7, they keep their 15.”

 

 

Avatar of admin

by admin

A Lesson On Firearms – Jessie Duff World Champion Shooter On The Range – Hannity

January 19, 2013 in "Bill of Rights", 2nd Amendment, Freedom, Government, Gun Control, United States Constitution, United States Sovereignty by admin

Jessie DuffA Lesson On Firearms – Jessie Duff World Champion Shooter On The Range – Hannity

Jessie Duff is recognized as one of the most accomplished competition shooters in the world. Competing – and excelling – in five different shooting disciplines, Jessie has won both world and national championship titles, included among them are the prestigious Bianchi Cup and the Steel Challenge World Speed Shooting Championships. Over the last couple years Jessie has been a fixture in the shooting sports industry representing her many sponsors, chief among them Taurus.

In addition to her numerous duties for the Taurus Shooting Team, Jessie, along with husband Matt, co-hosts the popular Friends of NRA television show on the Outdoor Channel, where the the couple help promote the fun and excitement of the shooting sports to legions of new shooters.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/index.html